Jamie Clubb Snr Member
Number of posts : 296 Age : 48 Job/hobbies : Coach/Writer Humor : Groucho Marx, Tony Hancock, Bill Cosby, Billy Connolly, Paul Merton, Ricky Gervais Registration date : 2008-06-20
| Subject: Scepticism versus Cynicism Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:53 pm | |
| Sceptics unfairly get treated like the party-pooper. I believe this is mainly because scepticism gets mistaken for cynicism. We may be doubters, but that doesn't mean we are pessimists.
I'd be interested in seeing what we define as a sceptical attitude and, by contrast, what we define as a cynical outlook.
Last edited by Jamie Clubb on Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:08 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
undercover sceptic Admin
Number of posts : 520 Age : 51 Location : N.E. England Job/hobbies : reading popular science, research. Humor : Dry Registration date : 2008-06-18
| Subject: Re: Scepticism versus Cynicism Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:07 pm | |
| A very good point made by Jamie, I myself have been attacked as a cynic on the grounds that I seek more evidence than one persons anecdotal evidence that acupuncure etc works because they underwent the treatment and it helped them. Heres the Wiki perspective on the argument: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sceptichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CynicFor me having a sceptical attitude is not about questioning every little thing, lifes too short! Nor is it about saying anything I do not understand is B.S. I do not understand how electricity works, but that doesn't mean it needs debunking. Nor is it my intention to debunk everything I am asked to investigate. Rather for me a sceptical nature requires I look at the evidence for and against, primary, secondary, empirical and anecdotal, while asking further questions until I come to a logical conclusion. Regards, Den. | |
|