Undercover Sceptic

Hi and a very warm welcome to The Undercover Sceptic Forum, I created this forum for like minded people to come and share their thoughts on sceptical subjects so please donate your wisdom freely for the furtherance of rational thought, Thankyou.
HomeCalendarFAQSearchUsergroupsRegisterLog in

Share | 

 Encyclopaedic Sceptic

Go down 
undercover sceptic

Male Number of posts : 520
Age : 45
Location : N.E. England
Job/hobbies : reading popular science, research.
Humor : Dry
Registration date : 2008-06-18

PostSubject: Encyclopaedic Sceptic   Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:30 pm

Ok I know im no Michael Shermer, Im not going to take his crown any time soon, but do I really have to have an encyclopaedic knowledge of everything of a sceptical nature in my head.

I get blievers asking inane questions about new age, alternative, supernatural, paranormal etc.

They give me some anecdotal evidence some pseudoscience BS etc and ask me how to explain that away, right there, no time to think check accuracy of evidence etc.

I do manage to swipe these people away in general with some curt remark and even a scientific answer on occasion.

What im trying to fathom is how do I find a catch all answer to silence these belief critics?

Usually I just tell them to do a bit of research on the subject using scientific journals rather than books from the airport terminals.

For me I want in depth knowledge in one subject area and build up a general knowledge to work from in others.

For instance Rob is a UFO enthusiast, So I would field those questions via Rob! Pretty simple to me - stick to what you know and get broad base for the rest!

Any views on this?



Skepticism is the agent of reason against organized irrationalism - and is therefore one of the keys to human social and civic decency.
Stephen J Gould

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Encyclopaedic Sceptic
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Undercover Sceptic :: General :: The Cafe-
Jump to: