Undercover Sceptic

Hi and a very warm welcome to The Undercover Sceptic Forum, I created this forum for like minded people to come and share their thoughts on sceptical subjects so please donate your wisdom freely for the furtherance of rational thought, Thankyou.
Home­Calendar­FAQ­Search­Usergroups­Register­Log in
Post new topic   Reply to topicShare | 
 

 Religious kooks spending your tax dollars.

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Goto page : Previous  1, 2
AuthorMessage
tim
Member


Number of posts: 70
Registration date: 2008-08-07

PostSubject: Re: Religious kooks spending your tax dollars.   Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:01 pm

Who told you that out of interest? Did you not see it yourself?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rob
Snr Member


Male Number of posts: 346
Age: 38
Location: Ireland.
Job/hobbies: Combatives, Skepticism, Design.
Registration date: 2008-06-20

PostSubject: Re: Religious kooks spending your tax dollars.   Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:11 pm

Well, I don't want to drag other people into it.

But I'm quite surprised you don't remember the thread where it came up yourself, and who informed us all, on the martial arts section of boards.

I have a very very long memory....

_________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof." - Marcello Truzzi
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.ucireland.com
tim
Member


Number of posts: 70
Registration date: 2008-08-07

PostSubject: Re: Religious kooks spending your tax dollars.   Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:14 pm

LOL @ my memory Very Happy

That sounds very vaguely familiar but I can't remember to be honest. Who posted that? Go on, refresh my memory.
I can't remember ever posting in the Islamic forum but maybe I did once or twice.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
tim
Member


Number of posts: 70
Registration date: 2008-08-07

PostSubject: Re: Religious kooks spending your tax dollars.   Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:29 pm

Did some digging.....

I presume this is what you are referring to:
Quote:
To elaborate. Tim and Judomick seemed genuinely surprised that others accused them of constant negativity. Tim used the analogy (I believe) that while he didn’t believe in god he was very interested in religion thus would discuss religion. On another thread Tim posted a cartoon that implied those who believed in creationism were mentally retarded, which kinda implies where Tims’ interest in religion lie’s. Now let’s stretch that analogy a bit and, seeing as Tim is interested in religion, he swings along to the Islam forum here on boards. Tim decides this would be a good place to turn threads on various topics into creationism/evolution debate’s and then finds himself banned from islam because the good folk there don’t see their board as being a place where they need to constantly explain/defend their beliefs and have written that into their charter. Now I’m not having a pop at Tim here (much ) the analogy is simply handy


This was a hypothetical scenario made up by the poster. I’ve never been involved in nay creationism/evolution debates on the Islamic forum.

I do however find it interesting that you notice trends between some posts here and some fictional posts that you never saw (what with them being fictional ) from a few years ago.
Smile

LOL at your response on the thread:
Quote:
That does not suprise me at all tbh.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rob
Snr Member


Male Number of posts: 346
Age: 38
Location: Ireland.
Job/hobbies: Combatives, Skepticism, Design.
Registration date: 2008-06-20

PostSubject: Re: Religious kooks spending your tax dollars.   Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:37 pm

Nice try, but not quite the one I was referring too...

Bye.

_________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof." - Marcello Truzzi
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.ucireland.com
 

Religious kooks spending your tax dollars.

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 2 of 2Goto page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions of this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Undercover Sceptic :: Scepticism :: Scepticality-
Post new topic   Reply to topic